146 replies to this topic

[Mully]

Light Skin :: Dark Skin :: Retro Skin

Downloads

England

Premier League
Arsenal - Download
Aston Villa - Download
Newcastle - Download
Liverpool - Download
Manchester City - Download
Stoke City - Download
Tottenham - Download

Championship
Leicester City - Download

Germany

Bundesliga
Bayern Munich - Download

Italy

Serie A
Bari - Download
Bologna - Download
Brescia - Download
Cagliari - Download
Catania - Download
Fiorentina - Download
Genoa - Download
Juventus - Download

Netherlands

Eredivisie
Ajax - Download

Scotland

SPL
Celtic - Download
Rangers - Download

Spain

La Liga
Real Madrid - Download

WIP
Eredivisie - Fuji_xi
Premiership - Mully, chokosc, Derek, Jose
Championship - Hull - Bibi
La Liga - Barcelona - Bibi
Serie A - Xerox, Spyboy84, Tevez94
SPL - Nick7

Edited by Derek, 29 January 2011 - 11:37 AM.

[Craig.]

I love it

[Dodds]

looks nice mate, i like the border although could do with a little drop shadow imo?

[Mully]

Jose., on 02 January 2011 - 06:05 PM, said:

looks nice mate, i like the border although could do with a little drop shadow imo?

It would ruin it imo, and it would then look like other facepacks, this has its own style and its inspired by simple web design, it fits in with the default skin very nicely, and is positioned so its not out of place.

Would love your help with this tbh.

[Joaquin Bibi]

Does us some screenshots on dark & retro. Still undecided.

[Mully]

[Mully]

3 template versions.

Wide player:


Small player:


Small Staff:

[Joaquin Bibi]

The design matteh did over at LW was better.


Your small/staff one's look too "choady"

[Mully]

Its nice yes, but its nothing new.

How many facepack styles have drop shadows, its generic, think outside the box.

The whole web design inspiration works well, double borders are in.

If we're going down the drop shadows route, we need to at least make them unique.

I've suggested these in the staff room before now:



http://www.garryaylo...ws-in-photoshop

[Joaquin Bibi]

Neither is yours. It's just a stoke instead of a drop shadow really.

The only benefit to yours is that it's a new dimension, but the small ones look sh*t.

[Mully]

Joaquin Bibi, on 02 January 2011 - 08:13 PM, said:

Neither is yours. It's just a stoke instead of a drop shadow really.

The only benefit to yours is that it's a new dimension, but the small ones look sh*t.

Strokes and drop shadows are completely different, not seen a facepack anywhere thats even considered using double borders that are used by nearly every designer nowadays.

[handy500]

the wide ones look graet mully.would be better if at least the manager pics were in wide style aswell.you will be doing the stoke pack first won't you ha ha.

[Mully]

handy500, on 02 January 2011 - 08:30 PM, said:

the wide ones look graet mully.would be better if at least the manager pics were in wide style aswell.you will be doing the stoke pack first won't you ha ha.

The reason there is seperate templates is:

1) The wide facepacks get shrunk in the manager profile screen.
2) Pictures of other staff are hard to come by and can only be found in profile shots.

Stoke wouldnt be my first actually :O

[Dodds]

they are actually growing on me mate, try a little gloss on the top or something i think it would give it a more classier look?

[Joaquin Bibi]

Mully, on 02 January 2011 - 08:16 PM, said:

Strokes and drop shadows are completely different

What I was trying to say was that's the only change really yet you questioned their originality. It works for the wide one's. Still undecided on the smaller ones. Might be because of the face proportion. In-game screenies on those as well?

Jose., on 02 January 2011 - 10:08 PM, said:

try a little gloss on the top or something i think it would give it a more classier look?

Not a bad shout.

[nick7]

These look impressive and great in game. just lack a little thing maybe the gloss affect as mentioned above.

[Mully]

Again glosses are very generic.

[Joey™]

Instead of the white border (double border if you like), what if it was transparent?

[Mully]

Update:

[Mully]