To the moderators'/site owner
Started by C Jordan, May 17 2011 01:37 AM
18 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 17 May 2011 - 01:37 AM
I would strongly recommend you to remove this article from your archive site
http://loswonderkids...-edgar-mueller/
This is in direct contravention of copyright laws having been published originally by myself and taken from here:
http://quazen.com/ar...-edgar-mueller/
where it was published by Stanza publications.
Should this article not be removed appropriate action will be taken.
http://loswonderkids...-edgar-mueller/
This is in direct contravention of copyright laws having been published originally by myself and taken from here:
http://quazen.com/ar...-edgar-mueller/
where it was published by Stanza publications.
Should this article not be removed appropriate action will be taken.
#2
Posted 17 May 2011 - 01:49 AM
C Jordan, on 17 May 2011 - 01:37 AM, said:
I would strongly recommend you to remove this article from your archive site
http://loswonderkids...-edgar-mueller/
This is in direct contravention of copyright laws having been published originally by myself and taken from here:
http://quazen.com/ar...-edgar-mueller/
where it was published by Stanza publications.
Should this article not be removed appropriate action will be taken.
http://loswonderkids...-edgar-mueller/
This is in direct contravention of copyright laws having been published originally by myself and taken from here:
http://quazen.com/ar...-edgar-mueller/
where it was published by Stanza publications.
Should this article not be removed appropriate action will be taken.
You signed up for that!
#3
Posted 17 May 2011 - 02:00 AM
C Jordan, on 17 May 2011 - 01:37 AM, said:
I would strongly recommend you to remove this article from your archive site
http://loswonderkids...-edgar-mueller/
This is in direct contravention of copyright laws having been published originally by myself and taken from here:
http://quazen.com/ar...-edgar-mueller/
where it was published by Stanza publications.
Should this article not be removed appropriate action will be taken.
http://loswonderkids...-edgar-mueller/
This is in direct contravention of copyright laws having been published originally by myself and taken from here:
http://quazen.com/ar...-edgar-mueller/
where it was published by Stanza publications.
Should this article not be removed appropriate action will be taken.
Firstly, I apologise for any trouble caused by this.
Having looked through that thread, it is clear to see that no link back to the original author was added that would clearly state it's source, and the full report, rather than an extract, was also posted.
Although I do not have the power to amend this myself, I'll make sure the people with the power to do so act upon it. Although LosWonderkids isn't technically affiliated with this site anymore, we should be able to get in touch with the administrator.
_________________________________________________________________
Hammy, on 17 May 2011 - 01:49 AM, said:
You signed up for that! 
This thread isn't for you non-mod/admin
#8
Posted 17 May 2011 - 09:12 AM
He does realise for it to be infringing Copyright law he would have to sign up for a Copyright, which isn't free, and state it clearly with every copy of his work?
I don't really see any evidence the pictures are copyrighted, just the name 'Quazen'.
If you don't want them copied freely mate, get some better protection on your site so you can't just Copy and Paste or save the full image and the thread seemed to be promoting your stuff anyway from a quick glance.
Personally, I'd leave it where it is, this pillock can't really do anything and LW is closed anyway, nobody's gonna look at it.
Wow.
That's so sad on so many levels.
I don't really see any evidence the pictures are copyrighted, just the name 'Quazen'.
If you don't want them copied freely mate, get some better protection on your site so you can't just Copy and Paste or save the full image and the thread seemed to be promoting your stuff anyway from a quick glance.
Personally, I'd leave it where it is, this pillock can't really do anything and LW is closed anyway, nobody's gonna look at it.
Craig., on 17 May 2011 - 08:13 AM, said:
Supports honesty and manages anger.
LMAO!!!
LMAO!!!
Wow.
That's so sad on so many levels.
#9
Posted 17 May 2011 - 09:26 AM
Jackk!, on 17 May 2011 - 09:12 AM, said:
He does realise for it to be infringing Copyright law he would have to sign up for a Copyright, which isn't free, and state it clearly with every copy of his work?
I don't really see any evidence the pictures are copyrighted, just the name 'Quazen'.
If you don't want them copied freely mate, get some better protection on your site so you can't just Copy and Paste or save the full image and the thread seemed to be promoting your stuff anyway from a quick glance.
Personally, I'd leave it where it is, this pillock can't really do anything and LW is closed anyway, nobody's gonna look at it.
I don't really see any evidence the pictures are copyrighted, just the name 'Quazen'.
If you don't want them copied freely mate, get some better protection on your site so you can't just Copy and Paste or save the full image and the thread seemed to be promoting your stuff anyway from a quick glance.
Personally, I'd leave it where it is, this pillock can't really do anything and LW is closed anyway, nobody's gonna look at it.
x10000000000000000
#12
Posted 17 May 2011 - 11:21 AM
Lets not all react negatively to the guy; sure he's come in here and handled the situation in a shocking fashion, but there may be a very good reason why after all this time he still wants/needs it removed.
As it stands, two good points were raised:
1. We have no affiliation or control over Los Wonderkids. Therefore we cannot do anything about this and we don't need to involve ourselves with it either.
2. No-one is going to read it anyway, so if it is deleted, who cares?
Jordan, contact Putzy (www.twitter.com/putzy); that is your best bet.
As it stands, two good points were raised:
1. We have no affiliation or control over Los Wonderkids. Therefore we cannot do anything about this and we don't need to involve ourselves with it either.
2. No-one is going to read it anyway, so if it is deleted, who cares?
Jordan, contact Putzy (www.twitter.com/putzy); that is your best bet.
#14
Posted 17 May 2011 - 06:25 PM
1) It's 2 years old
2) There is an attribution link in the bottom of the post to the original artist
3) All posts are owned by that post creator, not the site (as per registration rules at the time) - take it up with the person who posted the topic.
4) I've lost my access passwords to the site at this moment in time.
If you drastically need it removed, do what Game said - get me on Twitter @putzy
2) There is an attribution link in the bottom of the post to the original artist
3) All posts are owned by that post creator, not the site (as per registration rules at the time) - take it up with the person who posted the topic.
4) I've lost my access passwords to the site at this moment in time.
If you drastically need it removed, do what Game said - get me on Twitter @putzy
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users































