Jump to content


First & Youth Team Coaches


  • You cannot reply to this topic
5 replies to this topic

#1 ONLINE Dave

    I <3 GK

  • Fanboy
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,526 posts
  • Supports:  Portsmouth FC
  • Managing:  Girondins de Bordeaux
  • Game Year:  2011/12
  • Team MVP:  Jaroslav Plasil
  • Location:  The Valley, Anguilla
  • Nationality:  
Is there any benefit to having separate first team coaches and youth team coaches, as opposed to just having normal coaches who train both?

First thing I always do when joining a club is to offer all first team & youth team coaches new contracts as a normal 'coach' and then bin those that are shit/don't wanna change job roles. It seems a waste of money to have two separate teams when one will seemingly do, as their workload is never above 'light'.

Am I correct, or am I harming my team?
Posted Image

#2 OFFLINE Mansy

    One star man

  • Fanboy
  • Pip
  • 189 posts
  • Supports:  Bolton
  • Managing:  Bolton
  • Game Year:  2015/2016
  • Aim:  Top 4
  • Team MVP:  Shinji Kagawa
  • Location:  Sydney Australia
  • Nationality:  
Coaches cost more in terms of wages because they perform two roles within the club, but essentially they are better staff members.

All about opportunity Cost. More Wages > Better Staff members. And Vise Versa

#3 OFFLINE Jackk!

    Plymouth are shite!

  • Fanboy
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,251 posts
  • Supports:  -
  • Managing:  -
  • Game Year:  -
  • Aim:  -
  • Position:  -
  • Team MVP:  -
  • Location:  -
  • Nationality:  
Surely they'd have less effect due to less time spent training a group of players?

So surely, it's opportunity cost in the fact you choose between training youth or first team - both are important.

I make my best coaches, Youth Coaches or First-Team Coaches - and then general 'coaches' are just bitch boys who collect the cones and make up the numbers so the players dont start a mutiny.

#4 ONLINE Dave

    I <3 GK

  • Fanboy
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,526 posts
  • Supports:  Portsmouth FC
  • Managing:  Girondins de Bordeaux
  • Game Year:  2011/12
  • Team MVP:  Jaroslav Plasil
  • Location:  The Valley, Anguilla
  • Nationality:  

View PostJackk!, on 26 December 2011 - 01:34 PM, said:

Surely they'd have less effect due to less time spent training a group of players?

In reality, yes. But in the game? I'm not so sure. For example, I can give one coach tactics training for both first team players and youth team players and his workload never goes above light.
Posted Image

#5 OFFLINE Jackk!

    Plymouth are shite!

  • Fanboy
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,251 posts
  • Supports:  -
  • Managing:  -
  • Game Year:  -
  • Aim:  -
  • Position:  -
  • Team MVP:  -
  • Location:  -
  • Nationality:  
Fair enough.

I personally thought they would've considered time as an important variable in the case of having different classes of Coach, I don't think it's just aesthetic or purely for rep/status. Never had any confirmation from anyone knowledgeable though.

I've nearly completed my new backroom team. Just need to find 3 new Fitness Coaches then I'll start hiring/firing.

#6 OFFLINE CFCJames

    YNWA Stan!

  • Fanboy
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,803 posts
  • Supports:  Celtic
  • Managing:  Celtic
  • Game Year:  2011
  • Location:  Eire
  • Nationality:  
I dont think there is any disadvantages for only having "coaches".

I always get rid of my First Team coaches if they dont agree to just become coaches. I usually keep one or two youth team coaches to manage the under 19 though, im not sure why I just like it to be a youth coach that does that job :chuffed:

If it definatly doesnt have a negative effect then they need to look at it.

Posted Image






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users